![]() It is obvious common sense to redact signatures and yet Companies House argue that they cannot redact signatures because signatures are not specifically included in the list of items which should be redacted. For example there is NOTHING in the rules which prevents Companies House from redacting signatures before publishing documents - in the same way that local planning authorities do. ![]() In my experience Companies House interprets the rules in a manner which creates unnecessary exposure for fraud, especially identity theft. We ’re really looking forward to hear ing your views. You have until 5 August to have your say on the consultation. A ny third-party data processors would be subject to data protection requirements and contracts which means residential address es will continue to get the protection they need. As the data controller, we tak e the management of this data very seriousl y and a ppropriate security measures would be put in place. For example, to contractors engaged in providing core services on our behalf or to make more use of cloud-based services. There are instances where we’d need to disclose residential addresses to help transform our services to meet the future needs of the register. We ’ re also asking for your views on removing limitations i n our powers to use residential addresses which we keep privately. This additional information will only be accessible to law enforcement agencies and similar bodies in line with data protection requirements, and where appropriate information - sharing gateways are in place. As a result, the private information we ho ld will increase and will be kept securely with appropriate technical and organisational measures. This includes verify ing the identity of directors and persons with significant control. The consultation is also proposing that we collect more information on companies and individuals. It specifically asks whether directors should be able to apply to suppress the ‘ day ’ element of their date of birth, information about a historic registered office where this is their residential address, and signatures. P rotecting personal information on the register is a key area. The consultation is seek ing views on a series of reforms to our powers. W e’re aware of concerns over the publication of personal data such as full dates of birth, signatures, and residential addresses which have been used as a company’s registered office address. It’s also righ t that those individuals involved in companies are not exposed to potenti al harm, identity theft or fraud because their personal information is made available to the public.Ĭurrently we only have the power to suppress information from being available to the public in limited circumstances. It’s righ t that those looking to do business with companies have access to up - to - date company information as a trade-off for the limited liability status of those companies. It’s important that you understand what happens to that information when it ’ s filed with us. We’re required by law to publish information relating to companies, and individuals involved in those companies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |